Saturday, November 1, 2014

Investigative News Reporting

Job brokers steal wages, entrap Indian tech workers in the US
https://beta.cironline.org/reports/job-brokers-steal-wages-entrap-indian-tech-workers-in-us/
The investigation project I looked into has seven parts. After reading the first part, I can see that in the initial part of the investigation, CIR looked into legal documents and interviewed the victims involved to get an inside look at the immigrant labor abused in the tech industry. They attempted to interview the public relations departments at the companies that have been abusing the immigrant tech workers with financial restraints and legal repercussions if they try to leave or find a new job, but most of the time they were either denied an interview or were given a statement of denial. What they discovered in the course of the first part of this investigation was that these immigrant workers, mostly from India, are being restrained with legally binding contracts and lawsuits, usually signed without the workers understanding their rights, and often times paying the workers much less than they deserve and even suing them for the money they made when they try to get out. 
This investigation is absolutely necessary for our society. Without this kind of investigation, many would not know about the abuses of these immigrants, and nobody would be looking to resolve the problem. A lot of the victims cannot communicate their grievances effectively for varying reasons, and a lot of other times the victims simply return to their home country, defeated. It is the responsibility of journalists to uncover these abuses of power and bring them to the public light, so better reforms can be made. The problem of 'Techsploitation' is an ongoing one, that has been addressed by Congress before, but because of tech broker lobbyists and a lack of government oversight, the problem is persisting. Hopefully this investigation will prompt more attention from Congress and the government to find a resolution to the problem. 

Leads

Newsweek: Islamic State Kills 85 More Members of Iraqi Tribe
http://www.newsweek.com/islamic-state-kills-85-more-members-iraqi-tribe-281570

This lead sufficiently answers many immediate questions, as it is a hard news lead and is therefore an immediate-identification lead. I found it interesting that the lead was organized as its own paragraph, so it is a one sentence lead paragraph. I think it works because the sentence is a little longer for a lead, and it also satisfies all of the news questions except for How.


Newsweek: Why Do Some Die From Ebola and Others Survive?
http://www.newsweek.com/why-do-some-die-ebola-and-others-survive-281157

This lead is an immediate-identification lead, because it starts with how many people died as opposed to delaying that fact. It is a fairly satisfactory lead, but is made very strong with the sentence that is followed up by it that answers the remaining questions. Unlike the first story I analyzed, this one is made up of two smaller sentences, instead of one long sentence. It is a hard news story because the study it's talking about was published only the day before.


Newsweek: 'Distractions Is on the Syllabus': Poet Explains Why He's Teaching a Penn Class Called 'Wasting Time on the Internet'
http://www.newsweek.com/distraction-syllabus-poet-explains-why-hes-teaching-penn-class-called-wasting-time-280858

The lead in this story is interesting. Most interesting to me, is they quoted a tweet in the very first sentence of the article. It is a soft news story, so they quoted tweet can work for the story. The story is designed to entertain and inform, so they purposely held off important questions like Why and How is this class relevant and worthwhile. The nut graph of the story is actually a few paragraphs in, because it finally explains why the class is being offered and how it is going to teach the students, which is the actual importance of the story.